Contact : +336 70 66 04 42 contact@coordiap.com

CAP Liberté de Conscience 117, rue de Charenton - 75012 - Paris

Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience

NGO with ECOSOC consultative status at the United Nations
Registration on EU Transparency Register 628479527756-78
Civil society platform of Fundamental Rights created by the EU FRA
French non-benefit association register : W751082307
Member : European Federation for Freedom Of Belief - FOB
Member : European Network Of Religion and Belief - ENORB
Associate Director : International Council for Diplomacy and Dialogue

To:

Mr Emmanuel Macron

President of the French Republic

Brussels, the 28th October 2020

Copies to:

• Kishan Manocha, Head, Tolerance and Non-Discrimination Department, OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights

• Ahmed Shaheed, UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief

• Mr Gianni Buquicchio, President of the Venice Commission

• Mr Eric Dupont-Moretti, French Minister of Justice

Re: The announcements on the “Law on separatism”

Dear Mr President,

We write as an informal group of organizations and individuals who are scholars, religious leaders and human rights advocates. We are from many faiths or acting in a secular capacity, representing a high degree of diversity. While there is very little we agree on theologically, or politically, we all agree on the importance of religious freedom for all faiths and none.

We write to you following the announcements that you and members of your government have made regarding the bill on “separatism” that you plan to approve in the Council of Ministers meeting on December 9. While no draft of the bill has yet been circulated, to our knowledge, we have some concerns which have been highlighted by the announcements that have been made.

We acknowledge the cautious approach that you have taken during your official speech. We have noted your insistence on the fact that you are targeting radical Islam, and not Muslims, as well as the fact that you intend to respect freedom of religion or belief. We agree that terrorism is a real issue that needs to be tackled and that a strong response needs to be taken with regards to the dangers that are posed to the French Republic, and we deeply share the traumatisms that result from the recent tragic terrorist events which hit France.

Nevertheless, we are concerned that some of the proposals may lead to the opposite of what you intend. Furthermore, taking into account the statements made by members of your government after your speech, those statements reinforce the conviction that the measures being proposed will violate France’s international commitments towards freedom of religion or belief.

For example, you announced that you plan to ban home-schooling in order to protect children from illegal schools “often administered by religious extremists”. While we understand that these schools pose a threat, a global ban on home-schooling will affect the majority of parents that for many different reasons are using this freedom with satisfying results, regardless of their faith, or none. There is certainly sufficient provision in French law to organize controls and make sure that the children are effectively educated according to established educational programmes.

The “general concept” of the law was unveiled by your Minister of Interior, Gérald Darmanin, on Twitter. It explained that places of worship will be placed under increasing surveillance and “preserved […] from the diffusion of ideas and statements hostile to the laws of the Republic.” However, how will that apply to a priest or pastor criticizing abortion or same-sex marriage, which are part of the laws of the French Republic. What action will be taken against others who may speak out against certain “laws of the Republic” that penalize the poor and the immigrants? Or even if they criticize a law against blasphemy, as it existed still recently for Alsace-Moselle in France? Is anyone now criticising the law an enemy of the state?

Another announced provision that poses a problem is your statement and that of the Minister of Interior, where it is said that the law will allow religious and other associations to be dissolved directly by the Council of Ministers in the case of an “affront on personal dignity” and “use of psychological or physical pressures.” These concepts are vague enough to allow the arbitrary targeting of groups that are acting quite legally and without any violent intent but are in ‘disfavour’ by the administrating body. Furthermore there is no guarantee of judicial process or oversight.

The Minister of Citizenship, Marlène Schiappa, also stated in an interview that, “We will use the same measures against the cults and against radical Islam.” This shows that there is already a clear intent to deviate from the fight against terrorism and enter the realm of prohibiting religious associations on the basis that they do not please someone, simply because they are categorised as “cults” (sectes, in French).

Legislation aimed at terrorism is not surprising. It is a challenge that many countries face. However, States that have chosen to draft laws with such vague concepts as those cited above are States that have totalitarian tendencies (or are in fact totalitarian). Russia, for example, has passed an anti-extremism law that is now used to prosecute and jail political dissidents as well as members of peaceful religious movements such as the Jehovah Witnesses or followers of Said Nursi on the basis of their definition of “extremism”.

When the Venice Commission gave its opinion on law of the Russian Federation on Combatting Extremist Activity, adopted at its 91st Plenary Session, it stated:

« 7. The broad interpretation of the notion of ‘extremism’ by the enforcement authorities, the increasing application of the Law in recent years and the pressure it exerts on various circles within civil society, as well as alleged human rights violations reported in this connection have raised concerns and drawn criticism both in Russia and on the international level

(…)

28. The only definition of ‘extremism’ contained in an international treaty binding on the Russian Federation is to be found in the Shanghai Convention [on Combating Terrorism, Separatism and Extremism of 15 June 2001, ratified by Russia on 10 January 2003]. In Article 1.1.1.3) of the Extremism Law, ‘extremism’ is defined as ‘an act aimed at seizing or keeping power through the use of violence or changing violently the constitutional regime of a State, as well as a violent encroachment upon public security, including organization, for the above purposes, of illegal armed formations and participation in them, criminally prosecuted in conformity with the national laws of the Parties’. The latter clause allows signatory states to prosecute such ‘extremist’ actions according to their national laws. »

It made clear that the only definitions of ‘terrorism’ and ‘separatism’ that could be used to take action against individuals or organizations require that violence is an essential element (incitement to, or encouragement of, violence or actual violence).

The European Court of Human Rights has already applied this approach to Russia, regarding a case that involved the prosecution of followers of Said Nursi accused of extremist activities, in IBRAGIM IBRAGIMOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA, which became a final judgment on April 2, 2019.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion of Belief, in the unedited version of his last report on the Elimination of all Forms of Religious Intolerance (October 12, 2020), stated:

« 17. A concerning number of mandate communications highlight the use of inchoate terrorist offenses that are disproportionately applied to religious or belief minorities. Harassment measures broadly linked to countering terrorism and protecting national security illustrate that in almost every region of the world religious minorities appear to be at particular risk of being designated “terrorist groups” and of having members arrested under “extremism” or “illegal activity” charges. A number of communications addressed the use of national security imperatives as the stated objective by some governments in criminalizing membership in and/or activities of certain religious or belief groups. Such an approach amounts to targeting, and ultimately criminalizing, the peaceful expression of a person’s identity.

19. Numerous State authorities have arrested, detained (sometimes incommunicado) and sentenced members of religious and belief minorities for undefined charges such as intent to ‘disturb political, economic or social structures’ , to ‘disrupt state sovereignty’ or to ‘overthrow the Government’. Such vague provisions fail to fulfil the principle of legality as enshrined in article 15 of ICCPR and give worrying leeway to States to arbitrarily limit the exercise of freedom of religion or belief of certain groups. »

The OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) recently released a new document called « Freedom of Religion or Belief and Security: Policy Guidance ». It states in its introduction:

« While OSCE participating States have adopted different strategies to ensure that their own security measures are fully compliant with their international obligations and commitments pertaining to freedom of religion or belief, certain laws, security policies and practices have placed freedom of religion or belief and other universal human rights under significant pressure. Such measures, especially those that are very broad or applied arbitrarily, are often enacted in the name of “national”, “state” or “public” security, or in the interests of preserving or maintaining “peaceful coexistence”, “social stability” or “social harmony”. Experience shows that such limitations can worsen rather than improve security. »

There are many more international human rights documents that deal with this delicate issue, but for reasons of brevity we are unable to carry out a full review in this letter.

We are at your disposal to meet and discuss this issue further. In any case, we respectfully but strongly recommend that you submit to both the Venice Commission and ODIHR the draft of the law when it is ready, in order to get considered international legal expertise as to how the law meets established human rights principles.

We feel that there is a real risk that contrary to your intention, the proposed measures that have been announced will lead to the targeting of Muslims in general as well as other minority faiths, and that it may well lead to a series of human rights violations.

Respectfully yours,

Organizations

Advocates International

Advocates France

All Faiths Network

CAP Freedom of Conscience

CESNUR – Center for Studies on New Religions

EIFRF – European Interreligious Forum for Religious Freedom

FOREF – Forum for Religious Freedom Europe

HRWF – Human Rights Without Frontiers

International Christian Concern

Law and Liberty International

LDH – Ligue des Droits de l’Homme

LIREC – Center for Studies on Freedom of Religion, Belief and Conscience

ORLIR – International Observatory of Religious Liberty of Refugees

United Sikhs

UPF The Netherlands

Individuals

Régis Dericquebourg

Président

Observatoire Européen des Religions et de la Laïcité

Michael P. Donnelly, J.D., LL.M.

Senior Counsel

Global Outreach

The Most Reverend Joseph K. Grieboski

Senior Fellow

The Dietrich Bonhoeffer Institute

Rimon Kasher

Prof. Emeritus of Biblical Studies

Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel

Nancy Lefèvre

Chairwoman

Advocates France

Brent McBurney

President & CEO

Advocate International

Kareem P.A. McDonald

Program Associate

Religious Freedom Institute

Greg Mitchell

Chair, International Religious Freedom Roundtable

Scott Morgan

President

Red Eagle Enterprise

Matias Perttula

Director of Advocacy

International Christian Concern

Malik Salemkour

President

Ligue des droits de l’Homme (LDH)

Frans de Wolff

Secretary

Dutch Network for Interfaith Dialogue

Facebook Twitter

CAP Liberté de Conscience

IBAN BE61 9670 0987 0017

SWIFT / BIC TRWIBEB1XXX

Address TransferWise Europe SA
Square de Meeûs 38 bte 40
Brussels 1000 Belgium

ACTIVITES CAP LC 2018 / 2020

 

International Interdisciplinary Conference ‘Religious Freedom and Education’, 8-10 October, 2020

Re: Request to Impose Sanctions to Stop Turkey’s War Crimes in Northeast Syria and Beyond Under EO 13894 October 2020

Thierry Valle |President of the Coordination of Associations and Individuals for Freedom of Conscience, France August 2020

HRC45 – CAP Liberté de Conscience joins ACLU’s demands to the OHCHR for the elaboration of the report on structural racism and law enforcement September 2020

HRC 45 : Unabated Religious Persecution and the Danger of an Escalation — A Case Study on 20 Years of Persecution of Falun Gong in People’s Republic of China September 2020

HRC 45 : Violating the Human Rights of Members of Shincheonji in South Korea September 2020

HRC 45 : Report on the conditions and basic needs of citizens returning from displacement camps to Sinjar and its Southern area specifically September 2020

HRC 45: Jaswant Singh Khalra was remembered today at the 45th Session of the UN Human Rights Council September 2020

45th Session Human Rights Council : shincheonji oral statement September 2020

This World Day against Death Penalty the International Community must take immediate steps to ensure states repeal laws which mandate the death penalty for apostasy or blasphemy

523 NGOs wrote to the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights urge them to schedule country reviews no later than 2021 September 2020

The renewal of the mandate of the Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU

Urgent Call for the Dropping of All Charges Against Christian Pastor Keshav Raj Acharya

Letter to the Vatican

Sign on Letter to South Korean Minister of Foreign Affairs Religious Freedom Violations

Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Letter

the case of Huma Younus : Christian Pakistani girl who was kidnapped

Letter to the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Implementation of the Resolution on Police Violence and Structural Racism July 2020

A Letter to the Foreign Minister of South Korea on the Situation of Shincheonji July 2020

IRFR Letter to POTUS on Hong Kong June 2020

Letter to Ambassador Yasseen on recognition of Iraqi evangelical churches June 2020

Signatures on the China Coalition’s Emergency Internet Freedom Funding Letter June 2020

Urgent call for COVID-19 response for Refugees and Asylum Seekers june 2020

Joint letter to Vietnam’s Prime Minister May 2020

Open letter to UN Asia-Pacific Regional Group on China’s appointment to UN HRC Consultative Group May 2020

HRC 44th session Written statement : Croatia Discrimination based on ethnicity and disregard for the best interest of a child june 2020

HRC 44th session Written statement : An act of horrific brutality against a humane and compassionate Ahmadi woman charged under the Blasphemy law june 2020

HRC 44th session Written statement : Scapegoating members of Shincheonji for COVID-19 in the Republic of Korea

Petition to preserve the cemeterie in Vilnius Lithuania June 2020

Sign-On Letter re Vietnam Hmong and Montagnard Christians June 2020

The continuation of the mandate of the Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of  religion or belief outside the EU June 2020

Experts raise Vietnam’s human rights violations against Christians in letter to US  President June 2020

Joint letter to Vietnam's Prime Minister June 2020

Open letter to UN Asia-Pacific Regional Group on China’s appointment to UN HRC Consultative  Group June 2020

Urgent call for COVID-19 response for Refugees and Asylum Seekers June 2020

AHMADIYYA IN SCHOLARLY PERSPECTIVE June 2020

Experts raise Vietnam’s human rights violations against Christians in letter to US President June 2020

Report to the United Nations General Assembly on Eliminating Intolerance and Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief and the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG 16) HRC 44 June 2020

Letter to Secretary Pompeo April 2020

China HRC Consultative Group April 2020

IRF Roundtable Letter – Ramy Kamel April 2020

PETITION TO PRESERVE THE CEMETERIES IN THE OLD CITY OF LVIV April 2020

The continuation of the mandate of the Special Envoy for the promotion of freedom of religion or belief outside the EU April 2020

HRC 43 A coalition of NGOs questions the People’s Republic of China at the United Nations March 2020

HRC 43 Oral Statement on Religious Freedom in Russia  March 2020

HRC 43 Prolonged discrimination of religious minority in Germany March 2020

HRC 43 Status report Ezidis for the General Director of the United Nations (UN) March 2020

HRC 43 SOUTH KOREA – Coronavirus and Shincheonji: Stopping the Witch Hunt – Urgent Appeal from Human Rights Groups March 2020

HRC43 | Support consensus renewal of the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights Defenders March 2020

religious freedom situation in India February 2020

Multifaith letter regarding Huma Younus February 2020

Recognizing Freedom of Conscience and Religious Objections to State Mandated Vaccination and Ending the Persecution of the Unvaccinated People of Faith February 2020

End The Persecution of The Church of Almighty God Now! February 2020

Human Rights in Thailand and Malaysia : The case of the Ahmadis refugees in Thailand and Malaysia March 2020

Declaration of Principles for the International Religious Freedom Alliance February 2020

2019 Annual Report on the Chinese Communist Government’s Persecution of The Church of Almighty God Released Today January 2020

2019

FORB Roundtable meeting 10 December

Human Rights : Where are we at ? Past and Future

Universal Periodic Review pre-session Spain

Signin letter 2019

Sign On Letter: USCIRF Reauthorization

Eelam  Tamils  Genocide  in  Sri  Lanka

Another Minority Religion Under Threat in Russia: Who Is Afraid of Sri Prakash?

NGOs write to international Govt leaders to alert on 45 reporters of Bitter Winter arrested in China

Persecution of Chinese Refugees of The Church of Almighty God in South Korea Should Not Start Again

seekers from The Church of Almighty God (CAG)

Re: Pakistan’s Blasphemy Laws

OSCE 2019

Is Religious Freedom ever possible in the Russian Federation ?

COMPILATION OF WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS

OSCE HIDM 2019 Prasun Prakash

OSCE HIDM 2019 : Is Religious Freedom ever possible in the Russian Federation ?

Prasun Prakash Is Religious Freedom ever possible in the Russian Federation ?

From Warsaw to Paris: MIVILUDES will cease to exist on 1 January 2020

FOB at the Human Dimension Implementation Meeting 2019 in Warsaw

40th session of the Human Rights Council

Universal Periodic Review of China: NGOs Strike Back

HRC40 | States should defend environmental human rights defenders

Oral statement on China General Debate Item 6 – 40th HRC session

rejection of asylum in Japan for a persecuted religious minority in China

Human rights situation of Uyghur minority in Xinxiang region in China must be criticised

The Church of Almighty God’s Refugees in Japan: A Statement at the United Nations

North Korean Overseas Workers

Persecution of Uighur people in Xinjiang Uighur Autonomous Region (UAR), China

Limitations of religious freedom in China are now worse than they even were since the Cultural Revolution

Asylum Seekers from The Church of Almighty God in Japan

U.N. religious freedom expert seeks visit to China’s Xinjiang

The ban of Jehovah’s Witnesses in the Russian Federation

40th Human Rights Council Session : Clustered interactive dialogue with: Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief

41st session of the Human Rights Council

HRC 41 written statement : Misuse and Abuse of the Pre-trial Detention and the FIES System in Spain & the Kokorevs Case

hrc 41 written statement : Call for International Support against Norway’s requirement for the wearing of religious headgear for ID photographs

HRC 41 written statement : The case of the Ahmadis refugees in Thailand and Malaysia

HRC 41 writen statement : Forcible Deprogramming of Members of Shincheonji in Republic of Korea

HRC 41 oral statement : Forcible Deprogramming of Members of Shincheonji in Republic of Korea

42nd session of the Human Rights Council

International Peace Day Conference: Emerging religions persecuted by the CCP are making efforts for world peace

International Day of Peace UN Geneva : Totalitarian Regimes Are the Biggest Hindrance to World Peace

Nazioni Unite (ONU): “International Day of Peace”

Broadening the impact of Peace Wave

Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status : Misuse and abuse of the pre-trial detention and the FIES system in Spain & the Kokorevs Case

Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, non-governmental organizations in special consultative status : Give Kashmiris a voice for self determination

Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, non-governmental organizations in special consultative status : Dalibor Mocevic v. Croatia: denial of justice and ethnic discrimination in a property right case

Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status : Religion-based Refugees in France: The Church of Almighty God

Joint Statement of Ukrainian and Georgian Women at the UN “Women. Peace. Strategic Partnership. Joint Activities”

100 NGOs at UN Blast China’s Anti-Muslim Racism, Protest Silencing of NGOs

UN 42nd Session of the Human Rights Council ITEM 4 join oral statement FUNDACION VIDA – GRUPO ECOLOGICO VERDE – CAP LIBERTE DE CONSCIENCE – German sect filters

UN 42nd Session of the Human Rights Council Item 6 outcomes NORWAY Protection of Human Rights in Norway

UN 42nd Session of the Human Rights Council Oral Statement about the misuse and abuse of the pretrial detention and the FIES system: the Kokorev case

United Nations General Assembly : DAFOH Discusses Role of Forced Organ Harvesting as a Tool of Religious Persecution and Genocide in China

UNSG Guterres For China Now Censors In Geneva As He Has In NY For 429 Days Banning Press For CEFC China Energy

2018

 70th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights – A Commitment from Civil Society December 2018

Eelam Tamils Genocide in Sri Lanka December 2018

side-event 39th HRC session : FORB IN EU AND RUSSIA september 2018

side-event 39th HRC session : THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS INVALIDATES APPLICATION OF THE RUSSIAN LAW ON EXTREMISM TO PEACEFUL RELIGIOUS GROUPS september 2018

side-event 39th HRC session : RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND STATE NEUTRALITY: THE CASE OF HUNGARY september 2018

Oral statement 39th HRC session : Protection for the Religious Minorities of Afghanistan september 2018

Oral statement 39th HRC session : UPR OUTCOMES ON RUSSIAN FEDERATION september 2018

Oral statement 39th HRC session : UPR OUTCOMES ON GERMANY september 2018

39th HRC session joint written statement : It is time the Russian Federation ceases all persecutions against Religious Minorities september 2018

39th HRC session written statement : The denial of the religious plurality by Russian Federation september 2018

39th HRC session written statement : Religious persecution of a new religious movement in China september 2018

39th HRC session written statement: Protection for the Non-Muslim Religious Minorities of
Afghanistan september 2018

Side-event OSCE HDIM 2018 : How Universal is “The Universal Declaration of Human Rights September 2018

OSCE HIDM 2018 Working session 7 RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION AND STATE NEUTRALITY: THE CASE OF HUNGARY September 2018

Side-event OSCE HDIM 2018 : Freedom of Belief, No Discrimination and Telorance in the OSCE area September 2018

OSCE HIDM 2018 Working session 6 : The Denial of Religious Plurality in Russia September 2018

Side-event OSCE HDIM 2018 : The Religious Freedom in Eastern OSCE countries September 2018

OSCE HDIM 2018 : COMPILATION OF WRITTEN RECOMMENDATIONS September 2018

Faith and Freedom summit June 2018

Religious persecution in China denounced at the European Parliament June 2018

Chine : 1,5 million de personnes emprisonnées pour leur foi – La violation de la liberté de religion en Chine dénoncée au Parlement Européen juin 2018

Déclaration aux Nations Unies 38em session du Conseil des droits de l'homme: Principe de la laïcité et liberté de religion en France juin 2018

Joint oral statement at the 38th session of the Human Rights Council : Religious Freedom in the Russian Federation June 2018

38th session of the Human Rights Council Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience. The Russian Federation's religious freedom at the crossroads: barriers for indigenous nomadic shamanism June 2018

38th session of the Human Rights Council Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status The Role of FECRIS and Anti-Cult Organization in Russia June 2018

Join oral statement 38th session Human Rights Council :
Religious Freedom in China June 2018

38th session Human Rights Council Written statement submitted by Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience. Arbitrary Detention – China June 2018

 Freedom of Religion or Belief and the Right to Asylum: The Case of China June 2018

The Russian Federation and Religious Freedom : The hidden factor behind the bad religion concept may 2018

United Nations Human Rights Council Universal Periodic Review Germany May 2018

United Nations 30th UPR session : The Russian Federation and Religious Freedom May 2018

Deterioration of Religious Freedom in Eastern Europe at the United NationsMarch 2018

CAP LC organise à l’ONU une conférence sur la détérioration de la liberté religieuse en Europe de l'Est March 2018

Oral statement at the 37th session of the Human Rights council : Universal Periodic Review Czechia March 2018

Déclaration orale de CAP Liberté de Conscience à la 37ème session du Conseil des Droits de l’Homme aux Nations Unies (Genève) : Liberté religieuse et persécutions en Chine : Le cas de l'Église de Dieu Tout-Puissant March 2018

La France livrera-t-elle des réfugiés à leurs bourreaux ? March 2018

Conférence sur le refus des demandes d'asile en France pour les
réfugiés religieux chinois membres de l'Eglise du Dieu Tout-Puissant
March 2018

Le déni de la liberté religieuse en Chine et le cas de l'Église du Dieu Tout-Puissant exposés à la 37e session du Conseil des droits de l'homme aux Nations Unies March 2018

The denial of religious freedom in China and the case of The Church of Almighty God exposed at the 37th session of the Human Rights Council at the United Nations March 2018

Written statement submitted by Coordination des associations et des particuliers pour la liberté de conscience. CAP Liberté de Conscience expresses its concerns regarding the situation of minority religions in Hungary February 2018

Written statement* submitted by Coordination des associations et des particuliers pour la liberté de conscience, a non-governmental organization in special consultative status : Religious refugees (Church of Almighty God) from China denied asylum in Europe February 2018

International Convention «Law and Freedom of Belief in Europe, a difficult journey» January 2018

Laïcité and religious freedom: A coalition of NGOs questions France at the United Nations January 2018

Faith and Freedom Summit
https://faithandfreedomsummit.eu/
The Faith and Freedom Summit is not an organization. It’s a campaign proposed and run by a large coalition of faith-based and non faith-based NGOs and supported by many EU stakeholders. It has been launched on June 28, 2018 with a high-level launch event. This non-partisan event gathered high-level thought-leaders to highlight where religious freedom is hindered in European Union today, to assess areas that need to be improved as regards the protection of freedom of religion or belief, and to be a force of proposal to outline policies toward a greater respect of religious diversity in Europe.
FoRB Roundtable Brussels-EU
https://www.forbroundtable.org/
The FoRB Roundtable Brussels-EU is an informal group of individuals from civil society who gather regularly to discuss FoRB issues on a non-attribution basis. It is simply a safe space where participants gather, speak freely in sharing ideas and information, and propose joint advocacy actions to address specific FoRB issues and problems globally.

Contact : +336 70 66 04 42 contact@coordiap.com

Modify your subscription    |    View online